-
Work of committees
- Upcoming Committee Business
- About Committees
- Training Seminar - Committees@Work
- Committees (10)
- Committees Glossary
- Estimates Hearings
-
Inquiries
- Live and Archived Broadcasts
- Publications
- Guidelines (4)
- Subscribe
- Former Committees (67)
- 30 Year Release
- Past Alert Digest and Legislation Alert Indexes
- Ten Year Anniversary
Report No. 64, 52nd Parliament — The Accessibility of Administrative Justice, April 2008
False
committee's report
The committee tabled its report on 15 April 2008.
View: Report No. 64, 52nd Parliament — The Accessibility of Administrative Justice, April 2008.
View: Interim Government Response to Report No. 64 - The Accessibility of Administrative Justice, April 2008
View: Government Response to Report No. 64 - The Accessibility of Administrative Justice, April 2008
Overview
On 1 December 2005, the Committee of the 51st Parliament commenced an inquiry into The Accessibility of Administrative Justice. The Committee sought submissions on five key areas:
- What is the effect, if any, of the fees and charges regime under the Freedom of Information Act 1992 (Qld) on access to information? Is amendment of the FOI Act and/or administrative reform necessary?
- Do costs associated with proceedings under the Judicial Review Act 1991 (Qld) affect genuine challenges to administrative decisions and actions? If so, can this be addressed?
- Is information relevant to, and about, government decisions and actions adequate and accessible? How can it be improved?
- Can a diversity of people access administrative justice? If not, how can this be improved?
- Is access to administrative justice effective and efficient? Is reform necessary?
At the dissolution of the 51st Parliament, the Committee had not tabled its report on the inquiry.
The Committee of the 52nd Parliament resolved to report to Parliament on the matters considered by the previous committee in its inquiry into The Accessibility of Administrative Justice. In addition, the Committee broadened the terms of reference of its inquiry to include review of administrative justice.
Related Publications
Publication Details | Type | Published Date | Tabled Date | Committee Name |
---|
Submissions
- 1 - David Cotterill
- 2 - Thomas Mahon
- 3 - Queensland Law Society
- 4 - Rockhampton City Council
- 5 - Queensland Coalition
- 6 - Legal Aid Queensland
- 7 - Auditor General of Queensland
- 8 - Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian
- 9 - Brisbane City Council
- 10 - East End Mine Action Group Inc.
- 11 - Queensland Public Interest Law Clearing House Inc.
- 12 - Confidential
- 13 - Queensland Ombudsman
- 14 - Queensland Government